tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3985751029568188159.post3054963518589434823..comments2023-07-09T06:09:00.266-07:00Comments on Adventures in 1952 Topps: Cards #1 to #310 BinderedStack22http://www.blogger.com/profile/17776094817608096430noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3985751029568188159.post-28806179830038102242021-07-13T01:40:22.433-07:002021-07-13T01:40:22.433-07:00Awesome, but hard to enjoy the set in numerical or...Awesome, but hard to enjoy the set in numerical order. It's like holding the set for someone else rather than owning it for yourself. Make your own ordering for the set. "Play cards". Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3985751029568188159.post-63539540535092786952021-04-12T11:10:33.756-07:002021-04-12T11:10:33.756-07:00I agree. I have all my 1950s-70s cards in binders...I agree. I have all my 1950s-70s cards in binders (one card per pocket - none of that doubling up stuff), but the '86 to '92 factory sets I bought are still in their boxes. I don't have enough interest in them to put in binders (even though I pre-purchased enough binders and pages).<br /><br />What I do differently than others is group the cards by team, not in numerical order. Why? Because I don't care about numerical order. Having all players for a team together gives a better review of the team and season.Jim from Downingtownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01537007940455183397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3985751029568188159.post-53260011132432042842021-04-11T16:52:50.823-07:002021-04-11T16:52:50.823-07:00Completely agree that a set should be paged throug...Completely agree that a set should be paged through like a yearbook. I never understood storing your pride-and-joys in a box.<br /><br />I think this post will look quite similar to what I'm going to do for another vintage set in the near future.night owlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11673973790245316059noreply@blogger.com